Mold Library » Chrysosporium

Chrysosporium

Corda 1833

What is Chrysosporium?

Chrysosporium is a genus belonging to the phylum Ascomycota within the kingdom of Fungi. Chrysosporium sp. are mostly known as keratinophilic fungi, being specialized to degrade keratin. Keratin is an important protein with a structural and protective role in skin, hair, and nails. Some species within this genus invade keratinized tissues and are causative agents of dermatophytoses in animals and humans [1–3]. Besides this, they usually live as saprotrophs feeding on the keratin-rich remainings of dead animals. Chrysosporium species are important links for recycling nutrients (carbon, nitrogen, and sulfur) in nature. Since the soil represents the most usual habitat for these fungi, they are classified as geophilic (“soil loving”) dermatophytes.

Chrysosporium

How does Chrysosporium spp look like?

Chrysosporium sp. usually grow moderately at 25°C and display various colony morphologies. Colonies may appear granular or powdery, woolly or cottony, and can be raised or flat. They can also vary in colors, including white, yellow, or tan to pale brown on the front and white to brown on the back. Like other Ascomycetes, the hyphae of this genus are septated. Conidium is an asexual non-motile spore in fungi, and in Chrysosporium spp. are typically hyaline (transparent), pyriform (three-angled) to clavate (club-shaped) with truncate bases, and are broader than hyphae (Fig. 1). They can be smooth or rough-walled. Hyphae often differentiate into the chain of asexual spores, arthroconidium, and has a larger diameter than the parent hyphae. It has a role in fungal dispersion. Traditionally, Chrysosporium sp. were differentiated from each other by the growth conditions, the colony appearance, morphology, size, and the location of the conidia. However, due to poor morphological differentiation, Chyrysosporium sp. are not easy to identify and were often misidentified with other genera such as Geomyces, Malbranchea, or Sporotrichum [1]. The Chrysosporium genus revealed complex phylogenetic relationships within this genus [3, 4].

Chrysosporium keratinophilum conidia
Figure 1. Chrysosporium keratinophilum conidia (Photo source: Medmyco, Wikipedia)

The diversity of the Chrysosporium genus

Chrysosporium is a large genus with over seventy identified species [1]. Some of the most known are C. keratinophilum, C. tropicum, C. merdarium, C. zonatum, C. queenslandicum, and C. pannicola.

C. pannicola, C. keratinophilum, and C. tropicumare fast colonizers of human hair [5]. C. keratinophilumis also known to perforate and degrade buffalo, goat, cow, dog, and horsehair. This fungus can invade all three main structural components of the hair: cortex, medulla, and cuticle. The hair is digested by the enzyme called keratinase. The digestions are firstly manifested by undulation, lifting, and disrupting the cuticle, and in further steps, hyphae penetrate and damaging the hair cortex. Besides hair, C. queenslandicum and C. tropicum are also known to degrade feathers [6]. Due to its enormous keratinophilic potential, C. queenslandicum has been investigated for its usage in biotechnology to recycle poultry waste [7].

Additionally, some representatives of this genus are associated with other non-keratinous substrates [5]. For example, C. lucknowense is a highly potent producer of enzyme cellulase and was proposed for usage in the production of biofuels [8]. A study has shown that Chrysosporium sp. can produce 19 different types of enzymes [5], revealing the high biotechnological potential of this genus.

Interestingly, there is> Chrysosporium species found only on classic French cheese, C. sulfureum [9]. This fungus grows as a secondary invader on older cheese, which has already been populated with other fungal species, such as Penicillium and Scopulariopsis.

Where can Chrysosporium be found?

Chrysosporium species have been found in many different habitats around the world. These fungi live in natural environments and are abundant in the keratin-rich remains of dead animals in the soil, such as hair and feathers [10]. They have also been detected in the plant material and animal dung [3]. There are contradictory reports on these fungi being found as a part of the house dust microbiome. While one study reported they are not frequently found as a part of dust microbial communities [11], the other detected C. lucknowense as the most common dermatophyte in 42% of tested samples [12]. Interestingly, this fungus was found to be most abundant during April.

Is Chrysosporium species dangerous?

The Chrysosporium sp. that have been isolated from a human nail and superficial skin infections include C. keratinophilum, C. tropicum, and C. queenlandicum. They usually cause mild infections in humans and are sometimes responsible for onychomycosis. Several serious disease cases have been reported so far, and most were regarding immunocompromised individuals [13]. For example, invasive sinus mycosis due to C. tropicum infection has been described in patients with acquired immunodeficiency [3]. In one case, there was also a report of a massive subcutaneous infection in healthy women caused by C. keratinophilum [2].

There are several known cases of airborne pulmonary disease, adiaspiromycosis, caused by C. parvum [14, 15]. In the literature, closely related fungal species, Emmonsia sp., was often described as the causative agent of adiaspiromycosis. However, due to inconsistent and confusing nomenclature and taxonomy of Emmonsia sp. and Chrysosporium sp., there is a lack of consistent information on adiaspiromycosis and Chrysosporium infections.

Chrysosporium-related species are often described as reptile pathogens [16]. Pathogenic Chrysosporium-related fungi cause mycoses affecting both captive and wild snakes and lizards. Like the adiaspiromycosis causative agents in humans, there is some inconsistency in the traditional and modern terminology of Chrysosporium-related reptile pathogens. Furthermore, based on molecular analyses, these species mainly belong to the genera Nannizziopsis and Ophidiomyces, closely related to the genus Chrysosporium.

MB Did you know?

Did you know?


Bathrooms in Canada are the most affected by the Basidiospores mold group?! Find out more exciting mold stats and facts inside our mold statistics page.

References

  1. Stchigel, A. M.; Sutton, D. A.; Cano-Lira, J. F.; Cabañes, F. J.; Abarca, L.; Tintelnot, K.; Wickes, B. L.; García, D.; Guarro, J. Phylogeny of Chrysosporia Infecting Reptiles: Proposal of the New Family Nannizziopsiaceae and Five New Species. Persoonia Mol. Phylogeny Evol. Fungi, 2013, 31, 86–100. doi.org.
  2. Mijiti, J.; Pan, B.; de Hoog, S.; Horie, Y.; Matsuzawa, T.; Yilifan, Y.; Liu, Y.; Abliz, P.; Pan, W.; Deng, D.; et al. Severe Chromoblastomycosis-like Cutaneous Infection Caused by Chrysosporium Keratinophilum. Front. Microbiol., 2017, 8 (JAN), 2012–2017. doi.org.
  3. Liu, D.; Paterson, R. R. M. Chrysosporium. Mol. Detect. Hum. Fungal Pathog., 2012, 230–235. doi.org.
  4. Kumar, R.; Kushwaha, S. The Genus Chrysosporium, Its Physiology and Biotechnological Potential. Rev. Iberoam. Micol., 2000, 17 (SUPPL.), 66–76.
  5. Gusakov, A. V. Alternatives to Trichoderma Reesei in Biofuel Production. Trends Biotechnol., 2011, 29 (9), 419–425. doi.org.
  6. Vidal, P.; Vinuesa, M. D. L. A.; Sánchez-puelles, J. M. Phylogeny of the Anamorphic Genus Chrysosporium and Related Taxa Based on RDNA Internal Transcribed Spacer Sequences. Rev. Iberoam. Micol., 2000, No. January.
  7. Avasn, M. Y.; Aruna, L. K.; Ramakrishna, R. S.; Apta, C. D. Degradation of Feather and Hair by Chrysosporium Tropicum: A Potent Keratinophilic Fungus. African J. Biotechnol., 2011, 10 (18), 3579–3584. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB10.432.
  8. Kumawat, T. K.; Sharma, A.; Bhadauria, S. Chrysosporium Queenslandicum: A Potent Keratinophilic Fungus for Keratinous Waste Degradation. Int. J. Recycl. Org. Waste Agric., 2017, 6 (2), 143–148. doi.org.
  9. Microbial Foods.Org microbialfoods.org.
  10. Bohacz, J.; Korniłłowicz-Kowalska, T. Species Diversity of Keratinophilic Fungi in Various Soil Types. Cent. Eur. J. Biol., 2012, 7 (2), 259–266. doi.org.
  11. Sousa, A. C. A.; Almeida, J. R. S. L.; Pereira, C. C.; Ramiro Pastorinho, M.; Pereira, Â. M. C.; Nogueira, A. J. A.; Taborda-Barata, L.; Teixeira, J. P.; Correia, A. C. M.; Alves, A. Characterization of Fungal Communities in House Dust Samples Collected from Central Portugal-a Preliminary Survey. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health. A, 2014, 77 (14–16), 972–982. doi.org.
  12. Maghraby, T. A.; Gherbawy, Y. A. M. H.; Hussein, M. A. Keratinophilic Fungi Inhabiting Floor Dusts of Student Houses at the South Valley University in Egypt. Aerobiologia (Bologna)., 2008, 24 (2), 99–106. doi.org.
  13. Dincy, P. C. V; Meera, T.; Susanne, P. A.; Promila, R. M. Disseminated Cutaneous Chrysosporium Infection. Trop. Doct., 2019, 49 (4), 306–308. doi.org.
  14. Anstead, G. M.; Sutton, D. A.; Graybill, J. R. Adiaspiromycosis Causing Respiratory Failure and a Review of Human Infections Due to Emmonsia and Chrysosporium Spp. J. Clin. Microbiol., 2012, 50 (4), 1346–1354. doi.org.
  15. El-, K.; Ion, M.; Capacities, B.; Journal, I. P. Pulmonary Infection Secondary to Chrysosporium Zonatum in an Immunocompetent Man. AnnalsATS, 2013, 112 (3), 183–190. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1047951115001651.3.
  16. Ovchinnikov, R. S.; Vasyliev, D. B. Pathogenic Chrysosporium-Related Fungi in Reptiles and Other Animals. In Recent Trends in Human and Animal Mycology; Singh, K., Srivastava, N., Eds.; Springer Singapore: Singapore, 2019; pp 47–80. doi.org.
mold removal guidelines book cover 199

Get Special Gift: Industry-Standard Mold Removal Guidelines


Download the industry-standard guidelines that Mold Busters use in their own mold removal services, including news, tips and special offers:

Name(Required)


Written by:
John Ward
Account Executive
Mold Busters

Fact checked by:
Michael Golubev
General Manager
Mold Busters


Previous article:
Next article: